I Reign Christian Ministry Pastor speaks on assault on 3 women

starconnect
starconnect
Sexual offenses courts in Lagos
Sexual Offenses and Domestic Violence Courts, Ikeja, Lagos

Admin I Saturday, Oct. 21, 2023

 

IKEJA, Lagos, Nigeria – A cleric, with the Lekki based I Reign Christian Ministry, Pastor Feyiropo Daniels had denied assaulting three women at his parish stressing that all the women conspired and turned against him.

The pastor who was under cross-examination by  prosecution’s lead counsel, Babajide Boye at the Domestic and Special Offences Court, Lagos sought to establish that the defendant, Mr Daniels, who is the founder of the Lekki-based ‘I Reign Christian Ministry’ had a ‘personal relationship’ with four women.

Mr Boye alleged that the defendant had counselled one of the women, given the amount of N100,000 to one another woman for hospital treatment, paid school fees for one other and related with one other, as a leader in the campus fellowship affiliated with his ministry at Akungba.

The defendant denied giving money to one of the women for treatment.

“I believe all three ladies turned against me, but not (name withheld). She later apologised to me,” He said.

When asked why the accusations from the ladies were all sexual in nature, the defendant said he didn’t know.

Mr Boye also accused  the defendant that his position as a pastor and being someone who people approach for counselling put him in a position to manipulate people.

“You are a man of God. Are you not? A powerful man of God. You get trained to counsel, and you use wisdom and the leading of the Spirit.”

Mr Daniels said, “I am not a powerful man. I am a pastor. I do not use power to counsel people.I am not a manipulator,” the cleric told the court.

The Assistant Director at the Office of Public Prosecutions further grilled the defendant,

“You visited your Akungba fellowship centre and when she (one of the alleged victims) saw you, she hissed. Were you not surprised as a pastor?

 

“No. She was disgruntled because I couldn’t help her financially.”

“Are you her father?”

“No”

“So she isn’t your responsibility.

“yes”

During the cross-examination, the defendant also denied tampering with the WhatsApp messages between him and one of his alleged victims.

Justice Rahman Oshodi adjourned the matter to December 20, 2023, for the adoption of final written addresses from both counsel in the trial.

Earlier in the day, the judge admitted four statements purportedly written by the defendant whilst in police custody at various intervals last year. The documents dated, 31 May, 6 July, 17 Aug and 22 Aug, 2022 were tendered by the prosecuting counsel, Mr Boye during the cross examination.

The prosecution had sought to tender the documents, which he acknowledged weren’t confessional, but in a bid to impeach the testimony of the defendant.

“There are contradictions between the defendant’s testimony and the contents of the documents. We seek to impeach his testimony. We rely on section 232 of the Evidence Act, that evidence even though obtained improperly is still admissible and we urge the court to admit the same.”

The defence counsel, Adebayo Adegbite had argued that the statements weren’t admissible, adding that they weren’t made by the defendant and that he signed them under duress. When the court inquired from him as to the nature of the intended exhibits as a basis for his objection, Mr Adegbite replied, “the statements are a mixture of confession and denial, we leave it to the court to determine whether they amount to a confession. Right from the start of this trial, the defendant has denied the charges, that’s his plea. The documents weren’t made voluntarily. Even if there were contradictions, he wasn’t the maker of the documents, they were written by the police.”

In his ruling, Justice Oshodi admitted the four original documents. ” By section 9(3) and (4) of the Administration of Criminal Justice Law of Lagos State (2021), the presence of a video testimony of the suspect is desirable but not compulsory. I will admit the documents and later consider the evidential value to place on them. The objection of the defence is hereby overruled.”

 

Share this Article
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Be the first to get the news as soon as it breaks Yes!! I'm in Not Yet
Verified by MonsterInsights