Admin l Sunday, May 13, 2019
LONDON, United Kingdom – A Commonwealth Observer Group (COG) deployed to observe a referendum in Belize has described the vote as “credible, transparent and inclusive”. An interim statement has been released by the COG’s chair, former Bahamas Prime Minister Hubert A Ingraham, which lays out the group’s initial observations.
It says Belizeans who took part in the process had the opportunity to “express their will and exercise their franchise” and that the outcome “reflects the view of the majority of Belizeans who voted”.
Commonwealth Secretary-General Patricia Scotland recently re-deployed a COG to observe the referendum after the initial vote was postponed from 10 April to 8 May 2019.
The referendum question asked voters: “Do you agree that any legal claim of Guatemala against Belize relating to land and insular territories and to any maritime areas pertaining to these territories should be submitted to the International Court of Justice for final settlement and that it determine finally the boundaries of the respective territories and areas of the Parties?”
The referendum had been challenged before the Supreme Court of Belize on a number of grounds. This led to an injunction being issued by the Supreme Court delaying the original vote date. An appeal to the Court of Appeal to have the injunction lifted was lost by a majority vote.
Following the postponement of the referendum, the observer group departed Belize before parliament passed the Belize Territorial Dispute Referendum Bill on the 12 and 15 April. It was assented to by the Governor General and gazetted on 16 April with a new date set for 8 May.
The results saw 55,388 people vote yes (or 55.37 per cent) and 43,028 vote no (44.63 per cent). The official turnout was 64.93 per cent.
The group deployed across Belize from 7 May, covering Belize City, Belize District, Cayo, Stan Creek, Toledo, Orange Walk and Corozal. Observers met with election officials, police and monitors. They also met with regional observers to build a comprehensive picture of the conduct of the process and observed the Elections and Boundaries Commission’s preparations for the distribution of sensitive and non-sensitive materials.
