Emmanuel Thomas l Saturday, Sept 13, 2025
KATMANDU, Nepal – The recent wave of youth-led protests in Nepal, dubbed the “Gen Z protests,” has brought to the forefront a deep-seated frustration with the country’s political and economic system.
There is a need for a fundamental shift in how politics is conducted. This could involve electoral reforms to reduce the influence of money and family connections, and empowering institutions to function independently. Giving the youth a meaningful voice in policy-making, beyond the streets, is essential for a stable future
The “Gen Z protests” are a powerful signal that Nepal’s youth are no longer passive.
While the immediate trigger for the unrest was the government’s ban on social media platforms, the grievances run far deeper.
The young people taking to the streets are not just protesting a lack of digital freedom; they are demanding dignity, opportunity, and accountability in a country they feel has been failed by its political elite.
Challenges
The primary challenge in appeasing Nepal’s angry youth is addressing the root causes of their anger. A simple lifting of a ban or a cosmetic political change will not be enough. The core issues are systemic and include:
Rampant Corruption and Nepotism: Protesters are particularly enraged by the lavish lifestyles of the “nepo kids”—children of politicians and powerful bureaucrats—who flaunt their wealth online.
This starkly contrasts the struggles of the average Nepali youth, fueling a perception of an entrenched, self-serving elite. This visible inequality erodes public trust and makes any promises of reform seem hollow.
Lack of Economic Opportunity: Nepal faces a significant youth unemployment problem, with rates consistently higher than the national average.
The mismatch between the skills provided by the education system and the demands of the labor market exacerbates the issue.
As a result, thousands of young Nepalis are forced to seek low-wage work abroad every day, leading to a “brain drain” and a sense of lost potential.
Political Instability and Systemic Failure: The youth’s frustration stems from decades of political instability, where no prime minister has completed a full term in over 20 years. They view the very institutions meant to serve them as battlegrounds for political gain.
This has led to a deep disillusionment and a belief that the current political system is incapable of delivering meaningful change.
Prospects
While the challenges are monumental, the youth movement also presents an opportunity for a new political direction in Nepal.
The prospects for appeasing the angry youths lie in implementing genuine and transparent reforms that directly address their grievances:
Combating Corruption: Prime Minister Sushila Karki must demonstrate an unwavering commitment to fighting corruption.
This includes prosecuting corrupt officials, ensuring transparency in governance, and implementing robust accountability mechanisms. Restoring public trust will be a crucial first step.
Creating Economic Opportunities: The government must focus on developing a domestic economy that can provide decent jobs.
This requires investing in education and vocational training to bridge the skills gap, supporting entrepreneurship, and attracting foreign and domestic investment to create sustainable employment.
Political and Institutional Reform: There is a need for a fundamental shift in how politics is conducted.
This could involve electoral reforms to reduce the influence of money and family connections, and empowering institutions to function independently. Giving the youth a meaningful voice in policy-making, beyond the streets, is essential for a stable future.
The “Gen Z protests” are a powerful signal that Nepal’s youth are no longer passive.
They are demanding a new social contract based on merit, justice, and opportunity. The government’s ability to navigate this moment will determine whether the country moves toward lasting stability or remains in a cycle of unrest.
